Sort Articles by:

<a href="http://www.sodahead.com/living/what-do-you-prefer-as-a-tax-structure-for-funding-the-united-states/question-2318435/" title="What do you prefer as a tax structure for funding the United States?">What do you prefer as a tax structure for funding the United States?</a>

Follow Us on Twitter!

The Ohio Project

Register to Vote - Click Here

Gun Company Creates Stir and Sales

** Update 1047am Friday December 2nd 2011. Apparently the web traffic USAammo.com’s website from the news coverage has increased to a point and crashed their server at one point after it went viral. You can view a cached copy as seen below at the end of this article.**

Friday December 2nd, 2011
USAammo.com, a gun supply, ammunition, and supplies store who mainly targets sales online has created quite a stir with a controversial ad campaign. The campaign compares president Obama in the same context as Hitler, Stalin, Chairman Mao, and others who implemented gun control and killed millions through the government repression that allowed for mass genocide and tyrannical government controls.

The ad states that governments render their citizens defenseless through gun control. “Liberty is perpetuated by armed citizens. An armed citizen can defend himself against threat and foe.” the video explains. “The defenseless are subject to enslavement, imprisonment, and annihilation. ”

Apparently, the idea was conceived and emailed out early this week to coincide with Cyber Black Monday. And it has created a stir nationally in the political field.

Continue reading Gun Company Creates Stir and Sales

News flash for the President, we know you control the White House

Portage County TEA Party
September 12, 2010

Dear Editor,

This week President Obama visited Ohio for the 10th time in 18 months.  Every time he visits, the President keeps trying to tell us that he can’t turn the economy around because the Republican are the “party of NO” and will not vote for anything he wants.  Here is a news flash for the President, we know you control the White House, the Senate and the Congress. We know you don’t need any Republican votes to pass your agenda.  The fact is that he can’t get his own party to vote for his programs and those that have voted with him in the past are about to lose their jobs this November.

Why? Because his belief that government creates jobs and that government can stimulate the economy by raising taxes and/or borrowing money and then spending it on “make work” projects is flat wrong.  We have been forced to try it his way and it does not work and it has never worked.  Business creates jobs Mr. President and your anti-business policies are killing jobs, here in Ohio and across America.  We in Ohio are having it worse than the rest of the nation because we not only are hurt by the Presidents policies but also by our current Democratic Governor Ted Strickland who follows similar policies at the state level.

The President keeps talking about how we do not want to return to the policies that got us into this mess and he is absolutely correct.  The Republicans drove the car off the road toward the ditch with their excessive spending and government growth, but then the President hit the gas instead of the brake and drove us into the ditch and just keeps spinning the tires thinking he can drive us out with more spending and more borrowing and now more taxes.  They are both wrong, which is why we are going to send a lot more new people to Washington and Columbus this November than we have in long time.  We want to stop the borrowing, stop the spending, reduce the size and scope of government and get them out of our way.  Government spending is not the answer it is the problem.

Finally, let me say to the President that his insistence on trying to divide our country according to class and income is in a word “classless” and un-befitting of our leader.  This constant rhetoric pitting the rich against the poor is simply un-American.  Mr. President, if you or any other American hates the rich, then you’ve got a psychological problem that needs medical attention. The dream of all Americans is, and should be, that we ALL have equal opportunity to be rich through hard work and our own effort. The fact that you and many of your far left followers believe that government should impose “social justice” to make us all “equal” by deciding how much taxes any individual American or class of Americans “should pay” or “can afford” to pay is un-American.  It’s our money Mr. President, not yours, and you have no right to take it from us to fund your destructive and unconstitutional social programs.  I know a lot of small business owners who make “over $250,000 per year” whose employees take home more pay than they do.  Those business owners should not have to pay any more taxes than anyone else.  That would be true “social justice” when everyone finally pays their fair share instead of half the population paying little or nothing in federal taxes as will be the case for the first time in 2011 thanks to your policies.
Tom Zawistowski
Executive Director
Portage County TEA Party

Advancing Sharia law and Islamic domination in America

Written by Right Side News   
Wednesday, 25 August 2010

Walid Shoebat a former Islamic terrorist, whose mother tongue is Arabic as well as understanding the mindset of people from the Middle East, has been doing extensive research in the Arabic speaking media on what Imam Rauf has been saying and writing in the Arabic.

Walid Shoebat states, “Americans need to understand the level of deception and lies as well as the ends that Muslim clergy like Imam Rauf will go to advance their agenda of advancing Sharia law and Islamic domination in America.”

Continue reading Advancing Sharia law and Islamic domination in America

Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number

Social Security for President ObamaBy Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama’s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.

WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.

The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.

The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.

“Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office,” the Social Security website explains. “The first three (3) digits of a person’s social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number.”

The question is being raised amid speculation about the president’s history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.

Robert Siciliano, president and CEO of IDTheftSecurity.com and a nationally recognized expert on identity theft, agrees the Social Security number should be questioned.

“I know Social Security numbers have been issued to people in states where they don’t live, but there’s usually a good reason the person applied for a SocialSecurity number in a different state,” Siciliano told WND.

WND asked Siciliano whether he thought the question was one the White House should answer.

“Yes,” he replied. “In the case of President Obama, I really don’t know what the good reason would be that he has a Social Security number issued in Connecticut when we know he was a resident of Hawaii.”

Siciliano is a frequent expert guest on identify theft on cable television networks, including CNN, CNBC and the Fox News Channel.

Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is using a Social Security number beginning with 042.

WND has further confirmed that the Social Security number in question links to Obama in the online records maintained by the Selective Service System. Inserting the Social Security number, his birth date and his last name produces a valid Selective Service number.

Obama calls Britain's new Prime Minister David Cameron from the White House in Washington

To verify the number was issued by the Social Security Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Daniels used a Social Security number verification database. She found that the numbers immediately before and immediately after Obama’s were issued to Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.

“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” Daniels maintained. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”

Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?

“Never,” Daniels said. “It’s against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued.”

Daniels said she is “staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama’s use of this Social Security number is fraudulent.”

There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived inConnecticut.

Nor is there any suggestion in Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” that he ever had a Connecticut address.

Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.

Sampson’s affidavit specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, “it is my knowledge and belief that SocialSecurity numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence.”

Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.

“I doubt this is President Obama’s originally issued Social Security number,” she told WND. “Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a SocialSecurity number in Hawaii.”

The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama’s inauguration.

Politifact.com, a website typically supportive of Obama, claims he worked at the Baskin-Robbins in 1975 or 1976, prior to the issuance of the number in question.

“It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at Baskin-Robbins,” she insisted. “Under current law, a person is not permitted to use more than one SocialSecurity number in a lifetime.”

Another anomaly in the law enforcement databases searched by Daniels and Sampson is that the date 1890 shows up in the field indicating the birth of the number holder, along with Obama’s birth date of 08/04/1961. A third date listed is 04/08/1961, which appears to be a transposition of Obama’s birth date in an international format, with the day before the month.

Daniels disclosed to WND the name of the database she searched and produced a computer screen copy of the page that listed 1890 as a date associated with the 042 SocialSecurity number.

Daniels said she can’t be sure if the 1890 figure has any significance. But she said it appears the number Obama is using was previously issued by the SocialSecurity Administration.

After an extensive check of the proprietary databases she uses as a licensed private investigator, Daniels determined that the first occurrence of Obama’s association with the number was in 1986 in Chicago.

Daniels assumes, but cannot prove, that Obama took on a previously issued Social Security number that had gone dormant due to the death of the original holder.

Daniels has been a licensed private investigator in Ohio since 1995. Sampson formed his private investigations firm, CSI Consulting and Investigations, in 2008. He previously worked as a deportations law enforcement officer with the U.S. Department of HomelandSecurity.

The Daniels and Sampson affidavits were originally recorded by attorney Orly Taitz in an eligibility case against Obama last year.

This article is found at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=152773

Organizing for America Boot Camps

Organizing for America buttonAn organization called Organizing for America, otherwise known as OFA,  will be holding “boot camps” with the “purpose of the training schedule is to educate attendees on OFA’s policies and our strategy for 2010.”

OFA is a project of the Democratic National Committee and is the successor organization to Obama for America. Obama for America helped get the then presidential candidate elected to office.  Part of their goal is “to fight for a new kind of politics and a better future for our country.” according to their website.

A new kind of politics?

Most of the new kind of politics must be related to the same kind of politics we’ve seen from both sides of the aisle – Democrat or Republican. Promises during the campaign and then 180 reversals of those promises when it comes time for the rubber to meet the road.

OFA’s agenda “allows” for people to get involved in a variety of ways, including these from their website:

  • Joining grassroots OFA campaigns to support the President’s agenda. Online, on the phone, on doorsteps and in town halls in communities across the country, we’re building the bottom-up support that makes real change possible.
  • Spreading the word to friends and neighbors about the President’s approach on the big issues facing our nation, like health care, energy and education. Nothing is more powerful than your voice in your community.
  • Serving our community in ways big and small. Rebuilding America starts today.
  • Connecting with other supporters to form strong local groups, ready to take on whatever challenges we face.
  • Supporting leaders who share our values and are ready to carry forward the fight for change .

One issue that OFA helped push and is continuing the fight for is on health care. The new health care law that was signed into law will, according to the OFA website, ” end the worst insurance company abuses, establish new rules that treat everyone fairly, and provide more choices and affordable health insurance for millions of Americans.” according to their website.

The problem is that this “new form of politics” doesn’t treat everyone fairly as Ohio Free Press has noted before. Nor does it provide more choices or affordable health insurance for millions of Americans. For some reason, Congress exempted themselves from this new “law” that treats everyone fairly. That’s fair? Why do they get a “get out of jail free card” when the rest of America does not. Maybe they know something the rest of us don’t and it isn’t as good as they say it is? Is this example of the new politics and how everyone is treated more fairly – except those in positions of power? It makes one wonder.

The Organizing for America group is putting on many of these camps to gather together people once again for 2010 to continue the push of unpopular bills like the health care bill that recently passed. And you can find some of these right here in Ohio and elsewhere around the country. Just within a 200 mile radius of where I write this article there are 34 events going on between now and March 10th. These events range from phone bank calling events, bus rally trips to Washington DC for climate change (and Cap and Trade), organizing volunteers, and my favorite, a gathering to watch Michael Moore’s “Capitalism: A Love Story” movie (which is anti-capitalism and asks if capitalism is a “sin”).

It is evident that the goal of OFA, as seen from their event schedule, is a massive movement to organize people to continue a radical agenda on health care reform, deconstruction of capitalism, unionism, and and everything else that apparently the majority of American’s really don’t want to see (according to recent polls like 56% of voters nationwide favor repeal of the health care legislation according to Rasmussen).

It will be interesting to see how OFA is involved with the November elections. Apparently that is what they are gearing up for if you read the OFA website. Will it become the replacement agency for ACORN?  With the massive uneasiness with Washington’s current direction and ACORN all but incapacitated, the DNC needs all the help it can get.  Utilizing OFA for  voter registration would not seem out of the realm of possibility and that is what apparently some of the “training events” are designated to include.

Welcome to the new politics for 2010. Whether you like it or not.

You can view more information on Organizing for America at http://www.barackobama.com/learn/about_ofa.php

What’s Really Driving Obama’s Sudden Interest in Oil

By Keith Fitz-Gerald, Chief Investment Strategist, Money Morning                                                      April 2, 2010

U.S. President Barack Obama generated a lot of hubbub with his decision to open up parts of the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico to oil drilling.

We’ve all heard the criticisms that some of the geological surveys are as much as 30 years old, and the arguments that the ecological impact of drilling off the U.S. East Coast isn’t worth the accessible oil, which some critics estimate could play out in as little as six months at current demand levels.

But even after more than a day of debate over the motivations for – and possible results from – President Obama’s apparent energy policy about-face, one thing is very clear: This announcement has nothing to do with oil.

It’s all about the U.S. dollar. 

The Greenback Blues

As we’ve been explaining for several years now, there’s a global struggle under way to undermine the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Because most oil is priced in U.S. dollars, the United States bears no exchange-rate risk when it comes to the country meeting its energy needs. However, thanks to the weak-dollar policy of the U.S. Federal Reserve, oil has become a proxy for stored value – which means that anybody who wants to hedge against the greenback’s eventual decline and the $14 trillion in debt we’ve amassed must own the currency.

That’s why, as we suggested at the very onset of the global financial crisis, that countries such as China, Russia, Venezuela and a long list of others have scoured the globe to lock up supplies since this mess first unfolded.

So it only makes sense that Washington would seek ways to boost its own oil holdings. Unfortunately, with all these other global players already having made their moves, the Inside-the-Beltway gang is more than a day late and a dollar short when it comes to staking claims around the world. Not only that, but – with U.S. debt climbing – we can’t exactly walk in and strike favorable deals with a world that thinks our currency is a liability at this point.

A Lesson From History

If we look at how the world has changed since the U.S. drilling moratorium was put into effect in the first place decades ago, one thing becomes clear: The drilling ban has become too expensive to keep in place for much longer.

And it’s not just because of oil prices, which are destined to rise – by substantial amounts – over time. It also has to do with the opportunity cost of not opening the fields. In fact, everyday we don’t open them up increases the risk of a protracted U.S. decline – much like the one that England experienced during the 1900s.

At the end of World War I, England was the most powerful nation on earth, boasting both a solid economy and a healthy currency. Money flowed freely and the pound sterling was the world’s chief reserve currency.

By 1939, however, that had all changed. England had spent itself into oblivion and the pound sterling was being abandoned en masse by the international banking community – not to mention by the Crown‘s own subjects. To prevent a complete breakdown in global markets, the government made it an act of treason to use anything but the pound sterling to settle debts, while simultaneously implementing strict exchange-rate controls designed to prevent an all-out currency collapse.

By the start of the 1970s, Britain was all but bankrupt and unable to sell long-term government bonds, which may be a harbinger of things to come for this country, given our current trajectory.

So what saved Great Britain from oblivion? Many historians attribute this rebirth to the leadership of the dynamic Margaret Thatcher, and the proliferation of “Thatcherism.” But the truth is that the catalyst for the United Kingdom’s turnabout was the North Sea oil fields, which began pumping in earnest in the latter part of the 1970s – producing a trade surplus that helped engender new support for the pound in international markets.

As global-investing icon Jim Rogers observed when I interviewed him in August 2008: “Even if Mother Teresa had come in [as prime minister] in ’79, or Joseph Stalin, or whomever – … you know, Jimmy Carter, George Bush, whomever – it still would’ve been great. You give me the largest oil field in the world and I’ll show you a good time, too. That’s what happened.”

I hope you’re beginning to see a common thread, here.

I’m not projecting the U.S. economy to undergo a decades-long decline like the one that Britain experienced – though it is entirely possible. What I am saying is that the cracking open of huge-and-captive oil reserves may be a means of preventing such a scenario – or at least slowing it down.

The bottom line, then, is that President Obama’s apparently sudden policy reversal has nothing to do with energy security, or even environmental concerns, but is instead an attempt to offset the massive increase in U.S. debt with the only lubricant on the planet capable of offsetting the inflationary friction that the Team Bernanke Fed is creating – oil.

We’ve been saying for some time that oil prices are destined to head higher. This is just additional proof. Buy it while you can.

Link to this story here: http://moneymorning.com/2010/04/02/obama-offshore-drilling/

Fate of Obama’s aunt to be fought behind closed doors

BUCKING TO STAY IN U.S.: President Obama’s aunt, Zeituni Polly Onyango, 57, relaxes outside her South Boston apartment last July while wearing pearls and a dress her nephew gave her.

 

By Laurel J. Sweet
Tuesday, February 2, 2010 

The illegal alien aunt of President Obama could learn this week whether she can put down roots in Boston – or start packing her bags for a one-way trip back to Kenya. 

And, save for U.S. Immigration Court Judge Leonard I. Shapiro, she’ll know before anyone else. Zeituni Polly Onyango has persuaded Shapiro to bar the public from her removal proceeding Thursday morning at the John F. Kennedy Federal Building, though it’s unclear why. 

“I assume (Shapiro) thought it would be a three-ring circus. She’s the aunt of the president of the United States – the most famous man in the world,” said Mike Rogers, spokesman for the Ohio law firm defending Onyango, 57, against the Department of Homeland Security. 

Shapiro could not be reached for comment. However, Lauren Alder Reid of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review, which speaks for the court, said closed hearings are “not uncommon.” 

Reid said removal proceedings are sometimes held behind closed doors in cases of political asylum – such as Onyango is requesting – domestic abuse and security. 

“The immigration judge will hear the merits of the case from both parties,” Reid said yesterday. “The judge may make a ruling from the bench, but there’s no guarantee.” 

Onyango, she said, can call witnesses if she likes. 

Neither Reid nor Rogers claimed any knowledge of Obama meddling on behalf of his late father’s African half-sister, and Rogers said Onyango isn’t trying “to capitalize” on family favortism. 

“Everyone knows she’s related to him,” Rogers said. “It’s a no-win situation for him. He can’t get involved in this. The law has got to run its course.” 

Onyango, a computer programmer, has been in the country illegally since 2004, when Shapiro ordered her to leave. Recent attempts to reach her at the South Boston housing development where she’s been living since a December 2008 stay of her deportation have been unsuccessful. 

This story is found here: http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20100202fate_of_obamas_aunt_to_be_fought_behind_closed_doors/srvc=home&position=5