By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama’s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.
WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.
The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
“Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office,” the Social Security website explains. “The first three (3) digits of a person’s social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number.”
The question is being raised amid speculation about the president’s history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.
Robert Siciliano, president and CEO of IDTheftSecurity.com and a nationally recognized expert on identity theft, agrees the Social Security number should be questioned.
“I know Social Security numbers have been issued to people in states where they don’t live, but there’s usually a good reason the person applied for a SocialSecurity number in a different state,” Siciliano told WND.
WND asked Siciliano whether he thought the question was one the White House should answer.
“Yes,” he replied. “In the case of President Obama, I really don’t know what the good reason would be that he has a Social Security number issued in Connecticut when we know he was a resident of Hawaii.”
Siciliano is a frequent expert guest on identify theft on cable television networks, including CNN, CNBC and the Fox News Channel.
Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is using a Social Security number beginning with 042.
WND has further confirmed that the Social Security number in question links to Obama in the online records maintained by the Selective Service System. Inserting the Social Security number, his birth date and his last name produces a valid Selective Service number.
To verify the number was issued by the Social Security Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Daniels used a Social Security number verification database. She found that the numbers immediately before and immediately after Obama’s were issued to Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.
“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” Daniels maintained. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?
“Never,” Daniels said. “It’s against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued.”
Daniels said she is “staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama’s use of this Social Security number is fraudulent.”
There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived inConnecticut.
Nor is there any suggestion in Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” that he ever had a Connecticut address.
Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.
Sampson’s affidavit specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, “it is my knowledge and belief that SocialSecurity numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence.”
Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.
“I doubt this is President Obama’s originally issued Social Security number,” she told WND. “Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a SocialSecurity number in Hawaii.”
The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama’s inauguration.
Politifact.com, a website typically supportive of Obama, claims he worked at the Baskin-Robbins in 1975 or 1976, prior to the issuance of the number in question.
“It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at Baskin-Robbins,” she insisted. “Under current law, a person is not permitted to use more than one SocialSecurity number in a lifetime.”
Another anomaly in the law enforcement databases searched by Daniels and Sampson is that the date 1890 shows up in the field indicating the birth of the number holder, along with Obama’s birth date of 08/04/1961. A third date listed is 04/08/1961, which appears to be a transposition of Obama’s birth date in an international format, with the day before the month.
Daniels disclosed to WND the name of the database she searched and produced a computer screen copy of the page that listed 1890 as a date associated with the 042 SocialSecurity number.
Daniels said she can’t be sure if the 1890 figure has any significance. But she said it appears the number Obama is using was previously issued by the SocialSecurity Administration.
After an extensive check of the proprietary databases she uses as a licensed private investigator, Daniels determined that the first occurrence of Obama’s association with the number was in 1986 in Chicago.
Daniels assumes, but cannot prove, that Obama took on a previously issued Social Security number that had gone dormant due to the death of the original holder.
Daniels has been a licensed private investigator in Ohio since 1995. Sampson formed his private investigations firm, CSI Consulting and Investigations, in 2008. He previously worked as a deportations law enforcement officer with the U.S. Department of HomelandSecurity.
The Daniels and Sampson affidavits were originally recorded by attorney Orly Taitz in an eligibility case against Obama last year.
This article is found at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=152773
News flash for the President, we know you control the White House
September 12, 2010
Dear Editor,
This week President Obama visited Ohio for the 10th time in 18 months. Every time he visits, the President keeps trying to tell us that he can’t turn the economy around because the Republican are the “party of NO” and will not vote for anything he wants. Here is a news flash for the President, we know you control the White House, the Senate and the Congress. We know you don’t need any Republican votes to pass your agenda. The fact is that he can’t get his own party to vote for his programs and those that have voted with him in the past are about to lose their jobs this November.
Why? Because his belief that government creates jobs and that government can stimulate the economy by raising taxes and/or borrowing money and then spending it on “make work” projects is flat wrong. We have been forced to try it his way and it does not work and it has never worked. Business creates jobs Mr. President and your anti-business policies are killing jobs, here in Ohio and across America. We in Ohio are having it worse than the rest of the nation because we not only are hurt by the Presidents policies but also by our current Democratic Governor Ted Strickland who follows similar policies at the state level.
The President keeps talking about how we do not want to return to the policies that got us into this mess and he is absolutely correct. The Republicans drove the car off the road toward the ditch with their excessive spending and government growth, but then the President hit the gas instead of the brake and drove us into the ditch and just keeps spinning the tires thinking he can drive us out with more spending and more borrowing and now more taxes. They are both wrong, which is why we are going to send a lot more new people to Washington and Columbus this November than we have in long time. We want to stop the borrowing, stop the spending, reduce the size and scope of government and get them out of our way. Government spending is not the answer it is the problem.
Finally, let me say to the President that his insistence on trying to divide our country according to class and income is in a word “classless” and un-befitting of our leader. This constant rhetoric pitting the rich against the poor is simply un-American. Mr. President, if you or any other American hates the rich, then you’ve got a psychological problem that needs medical attention. The dream of all Americans is, and should be, that we ALL have equal opportunity to be rich through hard work and our own effort. The fact that you and many of your far left followers believe that government should impose “social justice” to make us all “equal” by deciding how much taxes any individual American or class of Americans “should pay” or “can afford” to pay is un-American. It’s our money Mr. President, not yours, and you have no right to take it from us to fund your destructive and unconstitutional social programs. I know a lot of small business owners who make “over $250,000 per year” whose employees take home more pay than they do. Those business owners should not have to pay any more taxes than anyone else. That would be true “social justice” when everyone finally pays their fair share instead of half the population paying little or nothing in federal taxes as will be the case for the first time in 2011 thanks to your policies.
Tom Zawistowski
Executive Director
Portage County TEA Party