Sort Articles by:

<a href="http://www.sodahead.com/living/what-do-you-prefer-as-a-tax-structure-for-funding-the-united-states/question-2318435/" title="What do you prefer as a tax structure for funding the United States?">What do you prefer as a tax structure for funding the United States?</a>

Follow Us on Twitter!

The Ohio Project

Register to Vote - Click Here

Zawistowski makes statement on Borges Tax Issues

Friday, April 12, 2013

Kent, OH

Tom Zawistowski, Candidate for Ohio Republican Party Chairman, made a statement today concerning news reports about his opponent’s delinquent taxes. Zawistowski said “I received a call from a reporter at the Dayton Daily news asking if I had any comment on a story they were working on concerning Mr. Borges’ delinquent taxes.  That is the first I had heard of the issue, but I can say that literally within hours of announcing my candidacy for Chairman on April 2nd,  I started to receive calls and emails from people I do not know telling me things that attacked Mr. Borges’s reputation. I told each of those people that I am not interested in their information.  In my view, this race is not about Mr. Borges, it is about the future of the Ohio Republican Party.  I am running because I am concerned about our Ohio Republican Party and I believe that I am uniquely qualified to address those concerns. I can unify our coalition partners, I can bring new members into the party and I can build the Ohio Republican Party into the powerhouse it should be. I am unveiling to the Republican State Central Committee a very exciting vision for the future of the Ohio Republican party. I am asking the  Committee to vote for me because of my ideas, my vision, and my leadership abilities and I believe that they will ultimately do so.”

Zawistowski is the CEO of TRZ Communication, the President of the We the People Convention, the Executive Director of the Portage County TEA Party and the recent Past President of the Ohio Liberty Coalition.  He has been running as the candidate that is “uniquely qualified” to unify the Republican Party. Zawistowski believes that he can return Social Conservatives to the Party, while keeping the fiscal conservatives and grassroots groups from leaving the party.  Joining them with the core moderate Republicans and then reaching out to Independents, including minorities, to grow the party base.

Obomacare’s Unionized “Gotcha”

shadowbosses-bookcover

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1798021716001/

THOUGHT LEADERS

MALLORY FACTOR_ CAPITAL FLOWS : FORBES September 10, 2012 (page 30)

“ONE OF THE GREAT mysteries of modern politics was the high level of union support for ObamaCare. Government unions spent tens of millions and used enormous political capital to pass it, yet universal health care should not be a core issue for unions because most of their members have more than adequate health care coverage. So why the overwhelming support?

Many commentators point to the concessions President Obama gave to the unions right before ObamaCare passed in Congress in March 2010. To solidifi’ labor support, Obama agreed to a seven-year moratorium on taxing the famed Cadillac health care plans that many union members receive-which increased the cost of ObamaCare by $120 billion. But this concession does not explain strong union support that existed before the President was even elected.

The real reason unions fell behind ObamaCare is that the law throws the door wide open for unionizing most of a 2l-million-member health care workforce. Right now only about one and a half million of America’s health care workers are unionized, less than 10% of the total. Many are self-employed or work in small offices and can’t be unionized under current law.

But the unions have several plans to overcome this hurdle, with the ultimate goal of unionizing every health care worker in America. The first plan is to drive more doctors, nurses and other health care workers to fold their private practices into large hospitals. Once employed by the hospitals, health care workers can be unionized as private hospital workers or as government employees if they work for government hospitals.”

Read more by subscribing to Forbes Magazine here: https://w1.buysub.com/pubs/B4/FRB/2499ControlP.jsp?cds_page_id=2499&cds_mag_code=FRB&id=1346501396843&lsid=22450709568047551&vid=1&cds_response_key=IL02FTRSC

MALLORY FACTOR IS THE AUTHOR OF SHADOWBOSSES: GOVERNMENT UNIONS CONTROL AMERICA  AND ROB TAXPAYERS BLIND.

Winning at all costs

The Left’s National Vote Fraud Strategy Exposed
by Accuracy in Media

This report reveals the Left’s vote fraud strategy for the 2012 elections. Like a KGB operation, it is thorough, multi-faceted and redundant. It has overt and covert, illegal and legal elements, the latter of which are designed, at least in part, to facilitate illegal activities later. It is a deliberate, premeditated, comprehensive plan to win the 2012 presidential election at all costs, and is in keeping with the organizational methods, associations and ethics of the Community-Organizer-in-Chief, Barack Obama.

The Left seeks fundamental structural change to our entire form of government. In keeping with their amoral, means-justifies-ends philosophy, they will register any voters, dead or alive, legal or illegal, who will then vote as many times as possible, in order to establish a “permanent progressive majority.” As two New York Democrats recently caught in a vote fraud scandal told police, “voter fraud is an accepted way of winning elections…”

Low income individuals are the perfect dupes for this strategy. An expanding welfare state makes them increasingly dependent on government benefits, a development that guarantees their vote for liberal-left candidates. At the same time, people with marginal attachment to society may be less inclined to report illegal activity at the polls—or actually participate. The “victim” narrative promoted in popular culture and press may even encourage such behavior. Meanwhile, a growing tax burden and public debt suck private enterprise dry—pushing ever more people onto the dole.

Continue reading Winning at all costs

ad blaming Romney for wife’s cancer death; they had her OWN health insurance

By Michael Zennie

PUBLISHED: 12:08 EST, 8 August 2012

The most brutal political ad of the 2012 election has blown up in the Obama campaign’s face after blatant deceptions were revealed in the story of a woman who died of cancer following the closure of a steel mill owned by Mitt Romney’s venture capital firm.

Joe Soptic, who has appeared in an anti-Romney ad before, links the loss of his job and health benefits at a plant in Kansas City, Missouri, to his wife Ilyona succumbing to stage four cancer in the new commercial titled ‘Understands.’ Mr Soptic says Romney doesn’t know what his private equity firm did to workers, ‘and further, I don’t think he’s concerned.’

However, it has come to light that Mrs Soptic had her own health insurance from her employer for years after her husband was laid off.

Furthermore, the plant closed in 2001 – when Romney was no longer involved in the daily operation of the company – and Mrs Soptic died five years later in 2006.

  • Video features steel worker Joe Soptic, who was laid off and lost his health benefits after the company owned by Bain Capital went bankrupt
  • Claims his wife Ilyona Soptic died of cancer as a result of him losing his health insurance
  • Mitt Romney was no longer leading the operations of Bain when the steel mill shut down in 2001
  • Mrs Soptic died five years after her husband lost his job

You can read the full story here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2185505/Deception-revealed-Obama-attack-ad-blames-Mitt-Romney-womans-cancer-death.html

Rebuttal to a Rebuttal

A rebuttal to a rebuttalA memo sent Friday morning from the Obama campaign targeted Mitt Romney’s record on business and time as Massachusetts’ governor.  Now, it is clear the the Obama administration is assuming that Romney will be the Republican nominee even though he needs 1144 delegates to win the nomination. Currently Romney has 20 delegates to Santorum’s 12 and Gingrich’s 0 (but this is another whole story on the media declared “front runner” and “obvious” future nominee).

So, I offer this rebuttal to a rebuttal. Not to defend Romney or endorse Romney, but to show that the current administration, who is pointing out defects in the media declared front runner Romney, reflects right back on them, but in a worse way. The words they use to sting Romney ring so true to home in the White House that I don’t think they can see the forest for the trees. My comments are in red, below. Continue reading Rebuttal to a Rebuttal

Ohio’s Issue 3 Health Care Amendment and what is really in it?

I have heard over the past several weeks many things against Issue 3, Ohio’s Health Care Amendment. They say that it will “have dramatic consequences” for child support enforcement, our ability to license doctors and nurses, for school immunization programs, and workers compensation. All of these are lies. Below is the actual wording for the Issue 3 that will appear on your ballots. Continue reading Ohio’s Issue 3 Health Care Amendment and what is really in it?

Why Senate Bill 5 Will Help Taxpayers – Or What is Wrong With Our System?

Student and TeacherCommentary as posted in the Columbus Dispatch

My wife and I are both retired schoolteachers, and we are divided about Ohio Senate Bill 5 and Gov. John Kasich. I’m for the proposal, but she doesn’t like it.

While at my wife’s retirement potluck dinner recently, I spoke to her family about the present state of education in Ohio, and then my mind started working. I taught in a district that had 85 percent reduced-price lunches. We were one of the poorest districts in the state, which means that for every dollar I was paid as a teacher, the state of Ohio paid 85 percent and the local residents paid 15 percent.

But herein lies the problem. Continue reading Why Senate Bill 5 Will Help Taxpayers – Or What is Wrong With Our System?

Some Interesting Facts on Issue 2

One of the interesting features of Issue 2 is that people who are in favor of repealing SB 5 (or Issue 2 on the ballot) is that it will cut teachers salaries and thus hurt the children. In reality, that’s one of the scare tactics government unions are using to turn people against these reforms. Nothing in Issue 2 determines salary levels. It only ends the practice of handing out automatic pay raises, or “step” increases, and longevity pay – or bonuses just for holding the job for a certain period of time. Issue 2 also asks that performance be added as a factor in teacher compensation, a goal President Barack Obama set out in his national education policy in 2009. I am sure your private sector job doesn’t include automatic pay raises but factors in performance. Shouldn’t those who teach our kids also be held to the same or higher standards? Continue reading Some Interesting Facts on Issue 2

Health Care Vote Highlights Obama’s Challenge in Ohio

By Caitlin Huey-Burns – August 1, 2011

Voters in the key battleground state of Ohio have an opportunity to deliver a verdict on President Obama’s landmark legislative accomplishment a year ahead of the 2012 election. Ohio’s chief election official confirmed last week that voters will get to decide whether they want Ohioans and Buckeye State employers to participate in the health care law Congress passed last year.

A group of Tea Party, limited-government and constitutional law activists spent over a year collecting signatures to get a health care amendment to the state’s constitution on the ballot this November. Earlier this month, they sent Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted 546,000 of them, and on Tuesday, the secretary confirmed 426,998 signatures; 386,000 were required.

The bill on the ballot would amend Ohio’s state constitution to block the federal government from requiring residents to carry health insurance, as the law Obama signed last year requires. Under the federal law, states are to set up their own health insurance markets. Ohio’s referendum measure, if passed, would make it illegal for state and local governments to regulate health insurance. That means that even if the federal health care law didn’t exist, Ohio couldn’t create its own state health care system, like the one in place in Massachusetts. Arizona, Oklahoma and Missouri voters have passed similar propositions.

When it comes to the individual mandate, however, the bill is largely symbolic. Federal law supersedes state law, and the courts are in the process of deciding the larger question of whether the government can require people to carry health insurance.

The symbolism, though, is important when it comes to 2012 politics. “Ohioans will send a very clear message to Washington that they don’t want politicians in D.C. controlling their health care decisions,” predicted Jeff Longsteth, campaign manager for Ohioans for Health Care Freedom, a group that helped collect the signatures.

That message will fall hard on President Obama, as health care reform has been perceived, for better or for worse, as his signature accomplishment, and Ohio has long been an election year bellwether for presidential candidates.

In 2008, Obama won the state by four points over John McCain. But voters in the state are unpredictable, and can’t be taken for granted by any candidate. For example, the state narrowly elected, and re-elected, Democrat Bill Clinton, swung for Republican George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004, and pivoted back to a Democrat three years ago after Obama’s campaign launched an extensive get-out-the-vote effort. Then Ohio turned red in the 2010 midterms, electing a Republican governor (John Kasich) and replacing five Democratic congressmen with Republicans.

Complicating Obama’s prospects in Ohio are the state’s high unemployment rate and voters’ sentiments about health care reform. The state’s unemployment rate was 8.8 percent in June, and a recentQuinnipiac University poll shows a large majority (67 percent) of Ohio voters oppose the individual mandate in the health care law (29 percent support it). The poll also shows that the majority of Ohio Republicans back the state ballot measure while the bulk of Democrats oppose it. But independents — a key voting block for any candidate in a swing state — support it, 49 percent to 44 percent. Overall, 48 percent of Ohio voters say they support the amendment while 45 percent oppose it.

Looking forward to the 2012 general election, the health care amendment, regardless of whether it passes, will be “an important issue for conservative Republicans, and they obviously will go into 2012 with this as a key issue for them,” said Paul Beck, a political science professor at Ohio State University. “But they aren’t going to vote Democratic anyway. So it’s this middle group of independents” that will make a difference.

Of course, just because voters say they support or oppose an idea doesn’t mean they will show up to vote on it. This measure will appear on the 2011 ballot and off-year election turnout is traditionally low. Longsteth’s and other groups will spend the next few months encouraging voters to go to the polls in November and educating them on the bill. (Also on the ballot is a measure to overturn the state’s collective bargaining law, which activists hope will encourage voter turnout.)

Progressives in the state, however, will certainly be just as active in mobilizing their voting bloc against the ballot measure. ProgressOhio pored over the signatures last week looking for discrepancies in an effort to challenge the secretary of state’s decision.

Conservatives’ efforts to block the federal health care law in Ohio appear to be stirring up progressives, whose enthusiasm for Obama had waned. Many felt the president’s health care plan didn’t go far enough, for example, and are frustrated by a perceived shift by the president to the center.

Now “they’re, in a way, giving Obama a life raft” by working to stop this opposition measure, said Cliff Schecter, president of the progressive public relations firm Liberatas. “These are the people that were excited about Obama last time.” Attacks from the right on health care “led to a resurgence” among progressives, he said. The president, though, can’t take them for granted either. “I think he should be worried about communicating with his base what his priorities are and . . . living up to more of the promises he made as candidate Obama,” Schecter said.

Meanwhile, state Republicans are also mobilizing their base on the health care amendment and insist that the measure, even if it doesn’t pass, will have national implications, as Ohio will be a major player in deciding who wins the White House. “This directly correlates with who is going to be on the ballot in 2012,” said Chris Maloney, communications director for the Ohio Republican Party. “Clearly this a referendum on ObamaCare.”

But Mitt Romney, who as governor of Massachusetts signed into law a state health care plan that has similarities to Obama’s, could also be on the general election ballot in 2012. The presidential candidate visited Ohio, which is not an early voting state, this week to speak about jobs and the economy and to rail against nationalized health care. He made a similar stump speech in another battleground state, Pennsylvania, last month. On the health care issue, Romney has repeatedly said that the plan he signed into law was specifically designed for Massachusetts and not the entire nation. It was the right plan for the state at the time, he often argues. And as president, Romney insists, he would move to repeal the national health care law.

He might have more defending to do on the issue in Ohio, however.

“He’s going to have to demonstrate to the Ohio constituency and the rest of America that his policies are radically different from what people are rejecting from Barack Obama,” said Rex Elsass, an Ohio-based Republican strategist not affiliated with any of the GOP campaigns. “He will have to explain what his vision is and how he is a contrast to Barack Obama. If he is not able to do that, he won’t be capable of winning.” Romney’s current defense, said Elsass, isn’t good enough, “and in the end, he is wrong. You’re going to see people of Ohio very clearly send a signal about that kind of thinking, and if that’s the way Romney thinks, he’s not going to fare very well in Ohio.”

The Ohio GOP, though, disagrees. “This is Ohio proactively taking the steps in addressing the health care challenges we face here and what’s good for the Buckeye State,” said Maloney. “I think that has been a lot of what we’ve seen Governor Romney communicate.”

The Ohio Projectinfo@theohioproject.com
http://www.TheOhioProject.com

Four Big Lies in Debt Limit Debate

Barack Obama and his minions continue to lie. Okay, this is it, I promise: my last column on the so-called debt crisis (at least until next month). I know you’re getting tired of hearing about it. Heck, I’m getting tired of writing about it. But the lies and distortions have gotten so outrageous in the past few days that I simply must get up on my soapbox one more time and try to clear up a few of the biggest piles of malarkey. (Some of you may prefer a stronger word for what’s being thrown around.) Here are the latest “Big Four” that got my goat.

There is no August 2 deadline.

I know; it’s hard to believe. All we’ve heard for months is economic catastrophe will befall us if the debt ceiling isn’t raised by Tuesday.

But where did that date come from? It was plucked out of thin air by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. It has no basis in fact, in law or in any accounting data anyone can present. The big spenders in Washington simply picked a date at random with which to frighten the American public.

Even Geithner admits that “technically” the government ran out of money two months ago. He says he used “extraordinary measures” and “accounting maneuvers” to delay the crisis as long as possible. But if he could do it for eight weeks, why not nine? Or 10?

READ THE ENTIRE STORY HERE!